Traditional risk models rely on data consistency. But in areas like ESG scrutiny, geopolitical volatility, or social license to operate, risk often emerges not from what happened, but from what people believe is happening.
This shift has led many analysts—especially in frontier markets and reputational advisory—to adopt storytelling models to simulate how a crisis might be interpreted.
It’s not fiction. It’s anticipatory framing.
Think of it like this:
At Penaga, we use these frameworks not to replace traditional analysis, but to augment it. Numbers tell you likelihoods. Narratives tell you meaning—and meaning is what shapes headlines, shareholder reactions, and regulatory escalations.
This doesn’t mean storytelling is passive. It’s a tool for action.
By shaping your own narrative early—through briefings, thought leadership, or internal alignment—you reduce the interpretive space that others can exploit.
Risk is what you can’t control. Narrative is how you control what others perceive as risk.
Risk has long been treated as a quantifiable variable—numbers, probabilities, hedges. But in today’s environment, risk is increasingly narrative. It unfolds as storylines, shaped not just by statistics, but by perception, context, and attention.